Do you have a right to know how your food is produced?
Look at any label on something made for human consumption. Whether it's a bite-sized candy bar, a box of cereal, or a gallon of pickles, you'll see lots of information: a list of ingredients, allergen warnings, calorie counts, vitamins, and even whether that item contains trans-fats.
What won't you see? Whether your food was genetically engineered.
But this might change in the near future. Consumers across the nation are demanding that information. Connecticut recently became the first state to pass a law requiring the labeling of genetically engineered foods.
Genetically engineered crops - plants with genes of another species inserted into their DNA - have grown increasingly common in our food supply since their introduction in the mid-1990s. While some organic food suppliers tout the lack of these ingredients, products containing these newfangled things are never labeled. Neither is our genetically modified produce, like sweet corn or papayas.
The majority of corn, soybeans, and cotton grown in the U.S. are all genetically engineered. And I dare you to pick up a box or a package of anything in a grocery store and find cookies, cereal, or even a frozen dinner that contains no corn or soy. Even your meat, milk, and eggs come from animals fed corn and soy.
Without labels, there's one way to avoid consuming genetically engineered foods: Buy organic.
These "frankenfoods" have been controversial from the get-go. Some consumers worry whether they're safe, some are concerned about their environmental impact, and others fear that they'll hurt our farmers. The lack of labeling isn't due to a lack of consumer demand for labels.
So why aren't they labeled? As one executive of the biotech giant Monsanto put it, "If you put a label on genetically engineered food you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it." They think that if you knew what was in the food, you wouldn't want to eat it.
National labeling requirements are up to the federal government. And the authorities in charge of that work assert that genetically engineered foods are "substantially equivalent" to normal food that has its original DNA intact. With no difference between the foods, there's no need for a label.
"If the foods are the same, then what the heck are they patenting?" asks Nancy Casady, who manages People's Food Co-op in San Diego. She's referring to the fact that each variety of genetically engineered foods is patented, and farmers who buy them must sign contracts prohibiting them from saving and replanting their seeds.
The way I see it, consumers simply have a right to know how their food is produced, whether the government says the food is "substantially equivalent" or not.
Even some proponents of genetic engineering are starting to think that labels are a good idea. When the industry fights hard against labels - often winning - it looks like they've got something to hide. (This is what labeling advocates have said for years. If these products are so great, why doesn't Big Ag brag about them?)
Nearly two decades since the first genetically engineered foods entered the American food supply, we're finally getting closer to labeling them.
Other right-to-know consumer movements have worked hard to pass their own labeling requirements without winning (yet), including California, Oregon, New York, Vermont, and Washington.
That's why it's such a big deal that Connecticut's measure passed with nearly unanimous support in both chambers of the state's legislature. There's a catch, though. The law includes two "triggers." Four other states must pass labeling laws before Connecticut's own law can go into effect. And some of those states must be in the Northeast.
Why do we have to fight so hard just to know how our food is produced? Shouldn't it be our right?
Columnist Jill Richardson is the author of "Recipe for America: Why Our Food System Is Broken and What We Can Do to Fix It."
Published July 3, 2013, in Allied News. Pick up a copy at 201 A Erie St., Grove City.
Do you have a right to know how your food is produced?
Dispute over meetings warrants public attention
Something funny is going on in Pulaski Township.
Mister Rogers vs. the Unity Tree
I was walking by Stanwix Street and Penn Avenue last week when struck by our city’s “Unity Tree.” It’s a curious thing about the Unity Tree: it only comes out at Christmas time — yes, Christmas.
Drilling anywhere in PA has implications for all
If you drink water, read this.
Sudden snow sometimes creates idiots on roads
Spring in December seemed to have sprung last Saturday when the sun was shining and the mercury rose above 40 degrees. The prediction of freezing rain for Sunday appeared way off the mark.
Online gambling study ordered for Pennsylvania
Coming on the heels of a report noting that total revenue from Pennsylvania slot machines for November was down 1.3 percent from last November, the state Senate recently passed a resolution, calling for a study of gambling in Pennsylvania, including the possibility of legalizing online gambling.
Obamacare stumbles over the basics of signups
Every new program is bound to have a few glitches. But what’s happening right now with the nation’s new health insurance program and online signup efforts is disturbing. And it creates uncertainty regarding the entire concept of health care reform.
Anti-cyberbullying efforts may be having effect
Parents everywhere must be rejoicing, because a new poll suggests that cyberbullying among students seems to be decreasing.
A veteran, 90, recalls Patton, Ike, freedom
I recently took my two teenage sons to a talk by Frank Kravetz, a 90-year-old World War II veteran who survived Hitler’s Nuremberg prisons. Frank published his story in a memoir, “Eleven Two: One WWII Airman’s Story of Capture, Survival and Freedom.”
California finds way to conquer partisan chaos
California has found a formula for ending the partisan warfare that once paralyzed its government: Get rid of one of the parties, in this case, the Republican. The state’s famously dysfunctional government now hums with calm efficiency.
Colorado residents document waste tsunami
As the people of Colorado are learning, it's horrendous enough to suffer the ravages of a natural disaster, but it's doubly horrific to then be faced with a more devastating unnatural disaster.
- More Opinion Headlines
- Dispute over meetings warrants public attention